GHG Sources Mapping: Your First Step to Sustainability

published on 14 December 2023

We can all agree that understanding where greenhouse gas emissions are coming from in your business is an essential first step towards setting and achieving meaningful sustainability goals.

By methodically mapping out the sources of GHG emissions, you gain visibility into your carbon footprint and can identify the most impactful areas to target for reductions.

In this post, you'll learn step-by-step how to conduct an emissions assessment, break down emissions by source and sector, systemize inventory management, and ultimately harness GHG insights to pave a strategic path to sustainability.

Charting a Path to Sustainability through GHG Sources Mapping

Taking steps towards sustainability begins with understanding your business's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Identifying the sources of emissions is crucial for crafting an effective emissions reduction strategy. By mapping GHG sources, businesses gain visibility into their carbon footprint across operations and supply chains.

Deciphering the Greenhouse Gases List and Their Sources

The main GHGs generated from human activity are carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and fluorinated gases. These arise from sectors like electricity generation, manufacturing, transportation, agriculture, and waste management. For example, carbon dioxide emissions largely stem from burning fossil fuels, while methane emissions are tied to livestock, landfills, and natural gas systems.

Businesses should categorize GHG sources following established frameworks like the IPCC emissions by sector. This provides a structured approach for carbon accounting and reporting. Key factors to document are emissions by source, scope, and gas type. Building this GHG inventory uncovers hotspots for emissions cuts.

The Business Case for Carbon Footprint Transparency

Stakeholder pressures and tighter regulations make carbon reporting non-negotiable for many companies today. Quantifying emissions sheds light on risks and opportunities. It also shows commitment to environmental stewardship amidst growing consumer sustainability demands.

With reputations and bottom lines tied to climate action, organizations must get serious about understanding their GHG sources. Emissions mapping lays the foundation for science-based targets, supply chain engagement, and impact communication. The GHG inventory serves as a compass guiding businesses smoothly towards sustainability destinations.

What are the 6 major sources of GHGs?

Globally, the primary sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions come from a few key sectors:

  • Electricity and Heat Production - The burning of coal, natural gas, and oil for electricity and heat is responsible for 31% of global GHG emissions. This makes it the largest emitting sector overall.
  • Agriculture - Agricultural activities including livestock, soil management, and rice cultivation account for 11% of global emissions. Methane is a potent GHG emitted from livestock and rice farming.
  • Transportation - The burning of fossil fuels like gasoline and diesel to power cars, trucks, ships, trains, and airplanes makes up 15% of emissions. As countries develop more transportation infrastructure, this share may rise over time.
  • Industrial Processes - The production of goods via chemical, mineral, and metal processes accounts for 12% of emissions. Many industrial processes emit potent GHGs like nitrous oxide and fluorinated gases.
  • Forestry - Deforestation and forest degradation make up 6% of global emissions when factoring in the impacts of land use change over time. Preventing further deforestation is crucial for climate change mitigation.

The remaining 25% of emissions comes from sectors like buildings, fugitive emissions, and waste management. Tackling the highest emitting sectors first can have an outsized impact on reducing overall GHG emissions globally. Understanding the sources of emissions is the first step organizations must take to map out a sustainability strategy.

What are 5 natural sources of greenhouse gases?

Natural sources of greenhouse gases have contributed to global warming long before human activity started significantly impacting Earth's atmosphere. Here are 5 of the main natural emitters of GHGs:

  • Forest fires

Forest fires release large amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere when vegetation and soils burn. They can also emit other GHGs like methane and nitrous oxide. Fires are a natural part of forest ecosystems, but human activity is causing more frequent and severe fires in many parts of the world.

  • Oceans

Oceans are actually a net sink of CO2, absorbing more than they emit. However, they are a natural source of other GHGs like methane, released from ocean sediments and aquatic organisms. Warming oceans could also reduce CO2 absorption.

  • Wetlands

Wetlands and peatlands emit methane from the decomposition of organic matter in the absence of oxygen. Efforts to drain wetlands for agriculture may have contributed to historical increases in atmospheric methane levels.

  • Permafrost

Melting permafrost leads to emissions of CO2 and methane. There are concerns that warming in polar regions could accelerate permafrost thaw and GHG releases, causing further warming.

  • Volcanoes

Active volcanoes release large amounts of CO2 from molten magma. While hard to measure, studies suggest volcanoes emit less than 1% of emissions from human activity.

The above natural sources have always led to some variability and fluctuations in Earth’s atmospheric GHG levels and temperatures over history. However, the unprecedented scale of human-caused emissions since industrialization are now the dominant factor influencing climate change.

What are the 4 most common GHG?

The most common greenhouse gases (GHGs) emitted from human activities are:

Carbon dioxide (CO2)

Carbon dioxide is released mainly from the burning of fossil fuels like coal, oil, and natural gas. Other sources are deforestation and various industrial processes like cement production. CO2 makes up the majority of global GHG emissions from human activities.

Reducing CO2 emissions involves transitioning to renewable energy sources, improving energy efficiency, preserving forests, and developing carbon capture technologies, among other approaches.

Methane (CH4)

Methane has a global warming potential more than 25 times greater than CO2 over a 100-year period. Sources include leaks from oil and gas systems, livestock digestion, landfills, and rice cultivation.

Strategies like improving waste management systems, changing cattle feeding practices, and fixing leaks in oil/gas infrastructure can reduce methane emissions.

Nitrous oxide (N2O)

Nitrous oxide comes mostly from agricultural soil management activities like fertilizer application and livestock manure. It has a global warming potential about 300 times greater than CO2 over 100 years.

Using precision farming techniques, reducing fertilizer use, and improving manure management practices can lower N2O emissions.

Fluorinated gases (F-gases)

F-gases like hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, sulfur hexafluoride, and nitrogen trifluoride have very high global warming potentials. Though small in quantity, their impact can be hundreds to tens of thousands of times greater than CO2.

F-gases are used in refrigeration, air conditioning systems, foams, and aerosols. Limiting releases through containment, recovery, and recycling can reduce their climate impact.

Mapping out these major GHG sources is the first step for companies to create targeted emissions reduction strategies on their journey towards sustainability.

What is the biggest contributor to GHG?

The biggest contributor to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions globally is the burning of fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas. This accounts for a whopping 75% of total global GHG emissions and almost 90% of all carbon dioxide emissions specifically.

Fossil fuels release carbon dioxide and other GHGs when burned to generate electricity, heat buildings, power vehicles, or enable industrial processes. As these emissions accumulate in the atmosphere, they trap more of the sun's heat, causing global temperatures to rise.

Some key facts on fossil fuels' outsized impact on climate change:

  • Coal burned for electricity and heat is the single largest contributor, responsible for over 40% of global CO2 emissions. Coal emits almost twice as much CO2 per unit of energy as natural gas.
  • Oil used in transportation, planes, ships, and vehicles makes up for over 33% of CO2 emissions. Extracting, refining, and transporting oil also leads to methane and other GHG leaks.
  • While natural gas emits 50-60% less CO2 than coal when burned for electricity, methane leaks during drilling and infrastructure still make it a major concern. Natural gas comprises 22% of global CO2 emissions.

The world must transition from fossil fuels to clean renewables like solar, wind, hydroelectric, geothermal and push for greater energy efficiency. Phasing out coal power plants alone could eliminate over 40% of emissions. With global carbon budgets shrinking, targeting fossil fuels provides the most impactful emissions reductions.

sbb-itb-919600f

Conducting a High-Level Emissions Assessment of Your Business

As companies seek to measure and reduce their ghg sources, the first step is conducting a high-level emissions assessment. This top-down approach maps out emission sources across your operations and supply chain to direct sustainability efforts.

Directing Attention to Direct Emissions: A Scope 1 & 2 Overview

Scope 1 and 2 emissions come from assets owned or controlled by your company, making them easier to measure.

  • Scope 1 accounts for direct emissions from company facilities, vehicles, equipment, and more. Review utility bills, fuel purchases, refrigerant recharges, and other records to estimate scope 1 emissions.
  • Scope 2 covers indirect emissions from purchased electricity and steam. Contact your utility provider to access usage data for facilities.

Mapping scope 1 and 2 ghg sources directs attention to areas of direct control. For example, switching facilities to renewable energy or optimizing production to reduce energy waste.

Estimating Indirect Impact: Navigating Scope 3 Emissions

Scope 3 emissions stem from value chain activities not owned by your company. While complex to measure, they often make up the majority of an organization's carbon footprint.

Some approaches to estimate scope 3 emissions include:

  • Supplier engagement - Ask suppliers to share carbon footprints of materials or services purchased
  • Spend analysis - Use financial records to estimate emissions tied to procurement categories
  • Benchmarks - Apply industry averages based on company size and sector
  • Sample calculations - Perform in-depth measurement of a subset of activities to model wider impact

Getting even a rough scope 3 estimate helps highlight hotspots for engagement across the value chain, though data quality improves over time.

Enhancing Accuracy with External Data Sources

Supplement internal records with reliable global emissions datasets covering GHG output by sector. Industry organizations may also publish benchmarked carbon factors.

For example, cross-checking a company's emissions per unit of product against averages for that industry can reveal performance gaps. External data provides reference points to pinpoint high-impact areas.

Assembling a detailed carbon inventory takes time, but a preliminary assessment focused on the largest ghg sources kickstarts strategic reduction efforts. Software like EcoHedge Lifecycle can automate data collection and analysis across scopes 1, 2, and 3. With an initial emissions map in hand, companies can target key hotspots, track reduction initiatives, and benchmark progress in lessening their climate impact over time.

Dissecting Global GHG Emissions by Sector and Prioritizing Action

Understanding where greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions originate from is the first step to developing an impactful sustainability strategy. By mapping emissions to their sources, companies gain visibility into the key areas to target for reduction.

Global analyses of GHG emissions by sector reveal common trends that can inform strategic priorities:

Applying the Pareto Principle to GHG Sources

The Pareto principle suggests that 80% of outcomes often result from 20% of causes. This pattern frequently emerges in GHG emissions as well, with a minority of sources responsible for the majority of a company's carbon footprint.

For example, analysis of global greenhouse gas emissions shows:

  • 25% originate from electricity and heat production
  • 24% from agriculture, forestry, and other land use
  • 21% from industry
  • 14% from transportation
  • 10% from buildings
  • 6% from other energy

This data highlights how a few key sectors tend to dominate GHG outputs. By focusing sustainability efforts on these areas of disproportionate impact, companies can create targeted reduction plans.

Prioritizing the minority of emissions sources generating the majority of carbon footprints allows for efficient allocation of resources. Companies avoid spreading efforts thinly across every area, instead concentrating on hot spots to maximize reduction returns.

Zooming In on Areas of Greatest Control and Influence

Within a company's own operations, conducting a granular GHG inventory illuminates the specific activities and assets disproportionately driving emissions.

Strategically, emission sources over which an organization has high control and influence provide prime opportunities for reduction initiatives. For example, a manufacturer may have:

  • High control: Over machinery, facilities, fleet vehicles under ownership
  • Low control: Over employee commuting, upstream supply chain impacts

By focusing action on high control areas, companies can implement changes more directly through capital investments, operational improvements, policy changes, etc. These sources also provide a means to demonstrate commitment through tangible reduction achievements.

Where control is lower, such as influencing staff behaviors or supplier practices, companies can engage through training, incentives, audits, or contractual agreements to drive change. However, reduction impact may be smaller or progress slower compared to direct action on owned assets.

Overall, analyzing GHG inventories through the Pareto lens highlights strategic priorities for sustainability. Focusing on the minority of emission sources responsible for the majority of impacts allows for targeted, high-impact initiatives. This data-driven approach builds efficient roadmaps to help companies responsibly curtail emissions.

Systemizing GHG Inventory Management for Effective Reporting

As companies embark on their sustainability journeys, systematically managing greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories is critical for tracking emissions over time and demonstrating progress. By implementing robust data collection, calculation methodologies, and reporting procedures, businesses can gain better control over their GHG footprint.

Drilling Down: Gathering Detailed Data on Key Emission Sources

The starting point for effective GHG management is identifying your company's key ghg sources. Conduct an audit to map direct and indirect emissions associated with operations, manufacturing, facilities, transportation, purchased goods and services, and more.

Prioritize gathering granular data for emission categories likely to represent a large share of your GHG inventory, such as:

  • Stationary combustion from onsite equipment and facilities
  • Purchased electricity for operations and offices
  • Transportation of goods via shipping fleets and third-party logistics
  • Energy use and waste generation from product manufacturing
  • Business travel by employees

Regularly collecting quality data on these major sources of greenhouse gases allows for accurate footprint calculations and forms the foundation for reduction strategies.

Selecting the Right GHG Calculation Methodologies and Factors

With detailed data in hand, adopt suitable emissions calculation methodologies based on industry-specific protocols like the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. Choose the latest emissions factors to derive realistic carbon dioxide equivalent values.

For example, pull country-level electricity emissions factors from annually updated sources like the International Energy Agency (IEA) to calculate your purchased power usage.

Tighten methodologies and swap outdated factors over time as reporting requirements and business operations evolve.

Embracing Automation for GHG Data Management

Manually gathering emissions data across a multi-site organization can prove extremely cumbersome over years of inventories. Consider purpose-built sustainability software to fully automate data collection and calculations.

Streamlining the process saves time and minimizes the chance of human error in large worksheets. Customized data integrations, smart forms, and digital reporting dashboards make regular GHG accounting simple and accurate.

Setting Standards for Consistent Emissions Reporting

To demonstrate your commitment to ongoing emissions reductions, establish a routine tracking and reporting cadence, such as submitting inventories annually.

Standardize your calculations and methodologies year-over-year for accurate comparisons. Detail your efforts around improving data collection procedures and updating emissions factors.

By taking a rigorous, metrics-driven approach, you build trust and transparency with key stakeholders expecting sustainability progress. The journey continues as you consistently track emissions and make strategic decisions to reach net zero.

Harnessing GHG Insights to Set Ambitious Environmental Targets

Understanding where greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are coming from within your business is the critical first step towards setting ambitious yet achievable sustainability goals. By mapping emissions to specific operational areas and sources, companies can contextualize their footprint and identify the most impactful opportunities to reduce it.

Contextualizing Emissions with Global and Sector Benchmarks

Once an initial GHG inventory has categorized and quantified emissions, it is insightful to compare this against regional, global, and industry benchmarks. For example, global greenhouse gas emissions per capita provide a macro-level emissions context, while comparing company emissions intensity against others in the same sector indicates relative performance.

This contextualization makes it possible to set goals aligned with science-based targets, policy frameworks like the Paris Agreement, or industry best practices. Companies can evaluate if their sustainability objectives are ambitious enough given their positioning and resources. Those lagging behind peers can set aggressive goals to catch up rapidly. Meanwhile, leaders can double down on innovations to further improve.

Identifying the Most Promising GHG Reduction Opportunities

Armed with a detailed understanding of the distribution of GHG sources within company operations, sustainability teams can pinpoint reduction opportunities with the largest potential impact. Common high-yield areas include:

  • Renewable Energy Investments: Transitioning to renewable energy often represents the single biggest emissions reduction opportunity. Options like installing solar PV, signing renewable energy power purchase agreements, or investing in community renewable energy projects can eliminate large swathes of Scope 2 emissions.
  • Efficiency Upgrades: Improving equipment and assets like HVAC systems, machinery, boilers, fleet vehicles, and buildings to be more energy and resource efficient directly translates into lower emissions. Streamlining processes can also optimize material and energy usage.
  • Carbon Capture & Storage: For some hard-to-abate emissions from high-temperature industrial processes, carbon capture technologies offer a path to neutralization. Captured CO2 can also potentially be utilized productively.

Using GHG insights to inform targeted reduction strategies in areas like these paves the way to meaningful emissions cuts over time. Paired with the right tools to measure and track progress, companies can transition smoothly to a sustainable future.

Key Takeaways: Envisioning a Low-Carbon Future with Strategic GHG Management

As businesses seek to reduce their environmental impact and carbon footprint, gaining a comprehensive understanding of emission sources is an essential first step. By methodically mapping out GHG sources across operations, companies can identify "hot spots" of high emissions and develop targeted reduction strategies.

Regular measurement and reporting then allows for the tracking of progress over time. As new technologies and solutions emerge, analysis of the latest emission data ensures improvement plans stay relevant. Ultimately this cycle empowers businesses to continually fine-tune their approach, making strides towards ambitious sustainability goals.

Mapping Emissions to Navigate Towards a Sustainable Horizon

An accurate inventory of GHG sources provides the baseline data to shape emission reduction roadmaps. While seemingly daunting initially, this process is hugely empowering. It shines a light on the activities and assets generating the highest levels of greenhouse gases.

With these priority areas mapped, companies can then research and evaluate potential solutions. These could range from infrastructure upgrades to process redesigns, technology integrations, behaviour change initiatives, or investments in renewable energy. Every business is unique, with interventions needing to align closely to its operational context.

By starting from a place of quality data though, the resulting emission reduction plans promise to be comprehensive, targeted, and economically viable. Companies enhance their understanding of achievable sustainability ambitions given current technological and budget constraints. Efficiency is simultaneously improved, ensuring no resources are wasted chasing overly generic or unrealistic goals.

The Cycle of Improvement: Measuring, Reporting, and Reducing

With an initial GHG source mapping and strategy development complete, the real work begins. Regular cycles of measurement, reporting and reduction constitute a continuous improvement loop.

As changes are implemented, up-to-date monitoring provides tangible proof of progress. Having access to real emissions data is hugely motivating for staff too, keeping sustainability top of mind. External reporting also maintains stakeholder confidence, evidencing the carefully planned nature initiatives.

Critically, actively analysing the latest emissions data repeatedly identifies new hot spots and opportunities. Emerging technologies, process innovations, product substitutions or retiring assets can all significantly alter emission profiles. Plans must flex accordingly, with companies continuously striving for better solutions and celebrating the small wins along the way.

Related posts

Read more